Menu
Lazrus Golf logo Product review

Lazrus Golf LAZ1 Hybrids review, scored

Cheap, easy-launching hybrids; returns cost a 10% fee plus shipping.

Health Corners editorial team · Claims checked against seller pages · Updated

LAZ1 Hybrids
Product photo from Lazrus Golf

#4 of 8 products in Golf

Calculated from published specs and owner feedback

See all golf
  • Overall 6.3
  • Social 7.6
  • Usability 4.9

Strengths and drawbacks

Published specs and owner feedback, not a hands-on test.

Strengths

  • Singles or sets cover #1 to gap wedge, right and left hand
  • Amazon rating of 4.4 across roughly 3,280 ratings
  • Phone, email and a Boise address are all published

Drawbacks

  • Restocking fee of 10% plus buyer-paid return shipping
  • Head covers are not included
  • Reviewers say the clubs suit slower swing speeds

How the score breaks down

Published features and owner comments · not a lab test.

Published features and owner comments · not a lab test.

  • Overall6.3
  • Social7.6
  • Usability4.9
How each score was set

Usability 4.9 /10

From published features and owner comments · not a lab test.

Build and materials5.0/10
Shaft material, loft, lie, length and swing weight are tabled per club; head material, country of manufacture and conformity are not stated.
Warranty and returns4.0/10
30-day return and 1-year warranty, but a 10% restocking fee, buyer-paid return shipping and no returns on used or discounted clubs.
Ease of use5.0/10
Singles or sets, right and left hand and flex choices are published; no drills or setup items apply, and head covers are not included.
Price and extras5.0/10
Singles from $89.99 and a 7-piece set from $497, with a 20% sale on; Amazon lists a single at $39.99, far below the brand's own price.
Support and owner reports6.0/10
Phone, email and a Boise address are published; Amazon shows 4.4 from about 3,280 ratings, while Trustpilot's 3.0 from 8 is under the floor.

Social 7.6 /10

Average of the independent owner-review sources listed below.

Marketplace reviews8.8/10
Product · 3,280 reviews · amazon.com
Independent web and YouTube7.0/10
Product · 3 reviews · golfspan.com, golfdecode.com, golfgearadvisor.com
Reddit7.0/10
Brand-level · 9 reviews · reddit.com

Claims we checked

The published claim, then what we found. Live statuses. How we review

The claim

30-day money-back guarantee

What we found

Fine print

The returns page adds a 10% restocking fee, buyer-paid return shipping, and no returns on used or discounted clubs.

Source · checked Nov 14, 2026

The claim

4.8 stars from 3,279 reviews on the LAZ1 Hybrids

What we found

Fine print

A brand-store figure whose count is within one of Amazon's 3,280 ratings but averages 4.8 against Amazon's 4.4, so it is not counted.

Source · checked Nov 14, 2026

The claim

1-year warranty

What we found

Contradicted

A 2026 review says Lazrus offers no long warranty, but the FAQ and returns page both state one year; chips and peels without a head cover are excluded.

Source · checked Nov 14, 2026

The claim

Singles from $89.99

What we found

Fine print

Amazon's listing for a single LAZ1 shows $39.99, so the brand's own store is the pricier channel; Amazon returns follow Amazon's policy.

Source · checked Nov 14, 2026

What changed

Every price, term and score change we logged, dated.

  1. Overall score 6.4 → 6.3

Before you buy

Get a Lazrus Golf coupon code

We’ll email it to you from Trusted Coupon.

Confirm by email first. Sent as “Trusted Coupon via Health Corners” by EmailerPros. We may earn a commission.

Tiers

Where a score sits among everything scored in the same category:

Needs at least 2 scored in the category.

How we review →
Social score

The average of independent owner-review sources (for example Reddit, Trustpilot and store reviews), weighted for volume and recency. A source with too few reviews is listed as “Not enough data” and left out.

How we review →
Usability score

Published features and terms (price, renewal, refunds, support and the category’s own criteria), each scored against written anchors. Calculated, not lab-tested.

How we review →